Makindo Medical Notes"One small step for man, one large step for Makindo" |
![]() |
---|---|
Download all this content in the Apps now Android App and Apple iPhone/Pad App | |
MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The contents are under continuing development and improvements and despite all efforts may contain errors of omission or fact. This is not to be used for the assessment, diagnosis, or management of patients. It should not be regarded as medical advice by healthcare workers or laypeople. It is for educational purposes only. Please adhere to your local protocols. Use the BNF for drug information. If you are unwell please seek urgent healthcare advice. If you do not accept this then please do not use the website. Makindo Ltd. |
A Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) is a feeding tube inserted directly into the stomach through the abdominal wall using an endoscope. It is indicated when a patient cannot maintain adequate oral intake due to conditions such as stroke with dysphagia, oesophageal/head & neck cancers, neurodegenerative disorders (MND, MS, Parkinsonβs) or severe trauma. π‘ Clinical pearl: In the UK, PEG is the standard method for long-term enteral feeding when endoscopic access is possible and sedation is safe.
π‘ Clinical pearl: Always assess for suitability of sedation and endoscopic access. PEG is preferred when feasible, but RIG is an alternative if endoscopy or sedation is unsafe (e.g. advanced MND with poor respiratory reserve).
Feature | Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) | Radiologically Inserted Gastrostomy (RIG) |
---|---|---|
Approach | Endoscopic visualisation of stomach via mouth β tube placed using pull/push technique. | Radiological (fluoroscopy or ultrasound) guidance to puncture stomach directly. |
Anaesthesia / Sedation | Usually requires conscious sedation Β± local anaesthetic. | Often done under local anaesthetic alone (useful in high-risk patients). |
Indications | β First-line for long-term enteral feeding when safe to sedate and pass an endoscope. | β Preferred in patients with poor airway protection, unsafe sedation (e.g. severe MND, frailty), or when endoscopy not feasible. |
Contraindications | Unsafe sedation, pharyngeal obstruction, severe coagulopathy, peritoneal sepsis. | Massive ascites, severe coagulopathy, peritoneal sepsis (relative contraindications). |
Benefits | β Well-established technique, high success rate, widely available. | β No need for sedation or endoscopic access; good for high-risk patients. |
Limitations | β Requires safe airway and sedation; risk of aspiration during procedure. | β Tube may be smaller calibre β higher risk of blockage; fewer centres provide service compared to PEG. |
Common Complications | π¦ Infection, bleeding, aspiration pneumonia, buried bumper syndrome, peritonitis. | π¦ Infection, bleeding, tube dislodgement/blockage, peritonitis (aspiration risk lower than PEG). |
Clinical Pearl | π©Ί First choice when patient can tolerate endoscopy + sedation. | π©Ί Best option for frail patients, those with poor respiratory reserve, or upper GI obstruction. |
π‘ Teaching Tip: In the UK, PEG is standard for long-term enteral feeding. Use RIG if endoscopy is not possible or unsafe. Always discuss with MDT (gastroenterology, radiology, dietetics, speech therapy) before insertion.