MAKINDO MEDICINEClinical textbook for medical students and doctors
For education and revision only. Not individual medical advice; check current NICE/BNF and local guidance before clinical use. Clinical safety and terms.
Chapter 208 of 268
Images
MAKINDO MEDICINE · Public Health208 / 268

Public Health: Health economics, quality improvement and global health

🌍 Health economics, quality improvement and global health. Resources are always limited, so every decision to fund one treatment means something else is not funded - the opportunity cost. Doctors need to understand how NICE judges value for money, how to measure and improve the quality and safety of care, and the global context of health. These topics feature in the UKMLA (clinical research, governance and professional knowledge) and MRCP.
Your four questions: What does it cost, and what is given up (opportunity cost)? How much health does it buy (QALYs)? How do we know care is safe and good quality, and how do we improve it? How does this compare globally?


Core Economic Concepts
  • Opportunity cost - the value of the next best alternative forgone when resources are used. The fundamental concept of health economics.
  • Efficiency: technical efficiency - achieving an outcome at the lowest cost; allocative efficiency - allocating resources to the mix of services that maximises health (or welfare).
  • Equity: horizontal equity - equal treatment for equal need; vertical equity - unequal treatment for unequal need (more for greater need).
  • Marginal analysis - the extra cost and benefit of a little more or less of a service, rather than the average.
  • Costs: direct (drugs, staff, equipment), indirect (productivity losses), intangible (pain, anxiety); perspective matters (NHS and personal social services in NICE reference case; societal perspective includes wider costs).
  • Discounting - future costs and benefits are valued less than present ones; NICE uses 3.5% per year for both.
  • Market failure in healthcare - information asymmetry, uncertainty, externalities (e.g. vaccination benefits others), supplier-induced demand - the economic justification for public provision and regulation.
Types of Economic Evaluation
TypeOutcome measureUse
Cost-minimisation analysisOutcomes shown to be equivalent - compare costs onlyGeneric versus branded drug with identical effect
Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA)Natural units (life-years gained, strokes prevented, mmHg)Comparing interventions with the same outcome
Cost-utility analysis (CUA)QALYs (or DALYs)Comparing across different diseases - NICE's preferred method
Cost-benefit analysis (CBA)Outcomes in money (e.g. willingness to pay)Comparing health with non-health investments
Cost-consequence analysisLists costs and multiple outcomes separatelyComplex interventions; decision-makers weigh them
  • Budget impact analysis - affordability for the NHS (NICE budget impact test: interventions costing over £20 million a year in any of the first 3 years may need managed introduction).
  • Decision analytic models - decision trees (short-term), Markov models (chronic conditions, cycles between health states).
  • Sensitivity analysis - tests how robust results are to uncertainty in inputs (one-way, probabilistic); results shown on a cost-effectiveness plane and acceptability curve.
QALYs, ICERs and the NICE Threshold
  • QALY (quality-adjusted life year) = years of life × utility (quality of life weight), where 1 = full health and 0 = dead (values below 0 are possible - states worse than death).
  • Utility is commonly measured with the EQ-5D questionnaire (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) valued using UK population preferences; alternatives include time trade-off and standard gamble.
  • Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) = (cost of new treatment − cost of comparator) ÷ (QALYs of new treatment − QALYs of comparator) = cost per QALY gained.
  • NICE threshold: from April 2026, NICE's standard cost-effectiveness threshold range is £25,000–£35,000 per QALY gained (previously £20,000–£30,000 since NICE's early years). Interventions below the range are usually recommended; above it, recommendation needs stronger justification.
  • Severity modifier (since 2022) - higher weight (QALY multipliers of 1.2 or 1.7) for conditions with a large absolute or proportional QALY shortfall; replaced the previous "end-of-life" criteria.
  • Highly specialised technologies (very rare diseases) use a much higher threshold (around £100,000 per QALY, up to £300,000 for exceptional benefit).
  • Dominance: a treatment that is both cheaper and more effective "dominates" its comparator.
  • Criticisms of QALYs: may discriminate against older people (fewer life-years to gain) and disabled people; insensitive to some outcomes (e.g. carers, dignity); utility values vary with who is asked; "a QALY is a QALY" (equity concerns).
Priority Setting and Rationing
  • Explicit rationing - formal decisions (NICE appraisals, ICB commissioning policies, Individual Funding Requests for exceptional cases).
  • Implicit rationing - waiting lists, thresholds for referral, dilution of services, deterrence.
  • Accountability for reasonableness (Daniels and Sabin) - fair priority setting requires publicity, relevance, a mechanism for appeal and enforcement.
  • Programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) - used by commissioners to reallocate spending.
  • NICE technology appraisal recommendations are mandatory - the NHS in England must fund them (normally within 90 days); clinical guideline recommendations are not mandatory but should inform practice.
  • Postcode prescribing - variation in access to treatments between areas, which NICE was established (1999) to reduce.
Dimensions of Quality
  • Maxwell's dimensions (1984): access, relevance to need, effectiveness, equity, social acceptability, efficiency and economy.
  • Institute of Medicine (2001) - six domains: safe, effective, patient-centred, timely, efficient, equitable (STEEEP).
  • Darzi (High Quality Care for All, 2008) - NHS definition: safety, effectiveness and patient experience.
  • Donabedian framework - evaluate quality through structure (resources, staff, buildings) → process (what is done - e.g. % receiving aspirin after stroke) → outcome (mortality, function, patient-reported outcomes).
  • Outcome measures: PROMs (patient-reported outcome measures - e.g. Oxford Hip Score after hip replacement), PREMs (patient experience), SHMI (Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator), HSMR.
Clinical Audit, Research and Service Evaluation
FeatureClinical auditResearchService evaluation
PurposeIs current practice meeting a standard?Generate new, generalisable knowledgeDescribe what a service achieves
StandardMeasured against an agreed standard (e.g. NICE)Tests a hypothesisNo standard
InterventionNo new treatment allocatedMay involve new treatments and randomisationCurrent service only
Ethics approvalNot usually neededRequired (Research Ethics Committee)Not usually needed
  • The audit cycle: choose a topic → set standards (criteria and targets, e.g. "100% of patients on methotrexate have FBC in the past 3 months") → measure current practice (data collection) → compare with standards → implement change → re-audit to close the loop.
  • National clinical audits - e.g. National Hip Fracture Database, Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP), National Diabetes Audit, MINAP (myocardial infarction).
  • Patient consent and confidentiality apply to audit data; use anonymised data where possible.
Quality Improvement Methods
  • Model for Improvement (Institute for Healthcare Improvement) - three questions: What are we trying to accomplish (aim)? How will we know a change is an improvement (measures)? What change can we make that will result in improvement (change ideas)? - then PDSA cycles (Plan, Do, Study, Act) to test changes rapidly on a small scale.
  • Measures: outcome, process and balancing measures (unintended consequences elsewhere).
  • Run charts (data over time with median; rules to detect non-random signals - shifts of 6+ points, trends of 5+, runs) and statistical process control (SPC) charts (control limits at ±3 SD) - distinguish common cause (random) from special cause variation.
  • Other tools: process mapping, fishbone (Ishikawa) diagrams, driver diagrams, Pareto charts (80/20 rule), 5 whys, Lean (removing waste - e.g. waiting, unnecessary movement), Six Sigma (reducing variation), human factors and ergonomics.
  • Sustainability and spread - plan from the start (NHS Sustainability Model).
Patient Safety and Learning from Incidents
  • Scale: about 1 in 10 hospital admissions involves a patient safety incident; around half are preventable.
  • Swiss cheese model (Reason) - harm occurs when holes in multiple layers of defence align; distinguishes active failures (unsafe acts at the sharp end) from latent conditions (system weaknesses - staffing, design, culture).
  • Human factors - design systems around human limitations (fatigue, interruptions, cognitive load); checklists (WHO Surgical Safety Checklist), standardisation, forcing functions (e.g. non-Luer connectors for spinal drugs).
  • Just culture - distinguishes human error (console), at-risk behaviour (coach) and reckless behaviour (sanction); encourages reporting.
  • Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF, 2022) - replaced the Serious Incident Framework in England; proportionate, learning-focused responses (after-action reviews, swarm huddles, patient safety incident investigations), involving patients and families. Incidents are recorded on Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE), which replaced NRLS.
  • Never events - serious, largely preventable incidents that should not happen if national guidance is followed (e.g. wrong-site surgery, retained foreign object after surgery, wrong-route administration of medication, overdose of insulin due to abbreviations, misplaced nasogastric tube not detected, transfusion of ABO-incompatible blood).
  • Duty of candour: professional (GMC/NMC - be open and honest when things go wrong, apologise, explain, put right) and statutory (Health and Social Care Act regulations - organisations must notify patients of notifiable safety incidents involving moderate or severe harm or death, apologise, and follow up in writing).
  • Medication safety: Yellow Card reporting (MHRA), the "Medication Without Harm" WHO challenge, high-risk drugs (insulin, anticoagulants, opioids, methotrexate, potassium).
  • Freedom to Speak Up Guardians - support staff to raise concerns; whistleblowing is protected (Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998).
Clinical Governance and Regulation
  • Clinical governance (Scally and Donaldson, 1998): "a system through which NHS organisations are accountable for continuously improving the quality of their services and safeguarding high standards of care by creating an environment in which excellence in clinical care will flourish".
  • Pillars: clinical effectiveness and research, audit, risk management, education and training, patient and public involvement, information and IT, staff management (and openness).
  • Regulators: CQC (registers and inspects providers - safe, effective, caring, responsive, well-led; ratings outstanding, good, requires improvement, inadequate), GMC (registration, revalidation every 5 years, fitness to practise), NMC, MHRA, HSSIB (Health Services Safety Investigations Body - independent safety investigations).
  • Revalidation - annual appraisal with supporting information (CPD, quality improvement activity, significant events, feedback from colleagues and patients, complaints and compliments).
  • Major inquiries that shaped governance: Bristol Royal Infirmary (1990s, paediatric cardiac surgery), Shipman (2005), Mid Staffordshire (Francis Report, 2013 - duty of candour, patient-centred culture), Morecambe Bay maternity (2015), East Kent maternity (2022), the Thirlwall Inquiry (Countess of Chester), and the Infected Blood Inquiry (2024).
Health Systems and NHS Funding
  • Models of funding:
ModelFundingExamples
BeveridgeGeneral taxation; mostly public provisionUK NHS, Spain, Nordic countries
BismarckSocial health insurance via employers/employeesGermany, France, Netherlands
National health insuranceSingle public insurer, mostly private providersCanada
Out-of-pocket / private insurancePayments at point of use, private insuranceUSA (mixed), many low-income countries
  • NHS founding principles (1948): comprehensive, universal, free at the point of use, based on clinical need not ability to pay. The NHS Constitution sets out rights and pledges (e.g. 18-week referral to treatment).
  • UK health spending is about 11% of GDP (around four-fifths publicly funded); the USA spends about 17% with worse life expectancy.
  • Universal health coverage (UHC) - all people can use the health services they need without financial hardship (Sustainable Development Goal target 3.8). Catastrophic health expenditure pushes about 100 million people a year into extreme poverty.
  • Health system building blocks (WHO): service delivery, health workforce, information, medical products and technologies, financing, leadership and governance.
Global Health
  • Global burden of disease: non-communicable diseases (cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory disease, diabetes) cause about 70% of deaths worldwide, increasingly in low- and middle-income countries; infectious diseases, maternal, neonatal and nutritional conditions remain major causes in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.
  • Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs, 2015–2030) - SDG 3: "Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages" - targets include maternal mortality below 70 per 100,000 live births, ending preventable newborn and under-5 deaths, ending epidemics of AIDS, TB and malaria, and UHC.
  • Child mortality: under-5 deaths have more than halved since 1990, but about 5 million children still die each year - mainly from neonatal conditions (prematurity, birth asphyxia, sepsis), pneumonia, diarrhoea and malaria; undernutrition contributes to about 45%.
  • Effective low-cost interventions: vaccination, oral rehydration solution with zinc, exclusive breastfeeding, insecticide-treated bed nets, skilled birth attendance, family planning, clean water and sanitation (WASH).
  • Global health security: International Health Regulations (2005), WHO Pandemic Agreement (adopted 2025), antimicrobial resistance, zoonoses and One Health (linking human, animal and environmental health).
  • Major global health actors: WHO, UNICEF, the World Bank, Gavi (vaccines), the Global Fund (HIV, TB, malaria), philanthropic foundations, NGOs.
  • Health worker migration - the UK recruits many doctors and nurses internationally; the WHO Code of Practice discourages active recruitment from countries with critical workforce shortages (WHO "red list").
Climate Change and Sustainable Healthcare
  • The Lancet calls climate change "the biggest global health threat of the 21st century" - heat, extreme weather, food and water insecurity, vector-borne diseases, air pollution, migration and conflict.
  • The NHS is responsible for about 4% of England's carbon emissions; "Delivering a Net Zero NHS" (2020) targets net zero by 2040 for emissions it controls directly and 2045 for its wider supply chain.
  • Clinical actions: reduce low-value care, deprescribe, choose low-carbon inhalers where clinically appropriate (dry-powder rather than pressurised MDIs), reduce desflurane and nitrous oxide waste in anaesthesia, prevention (the most sustainable care is care that is not needed), remote consultations where appropriate, active travel.
  • Co-benefits - active travel and plant-rich diets improve health and reduce emissions.
At a Glance
ConceptRemember
Opportunity costValue of the best alternative forgone
CUAOutcome in QALYs; NICE's preferred method
ICERΔcost ÷ ΔQALY
NICE threshold£25,000–£35,000 per QALY (from April 2026); 3.5% discounting
Audit cycleStandard → measure → compare → change → re-audit
Model for ImprovementAim, measures, changes + PDSA cycles
DonabedianStructure, process, outcome
Duty of candourProfessional and statutory; moderate/severe harm triggers statutory duty
PSIRFReplaced the Serious Incident Framework (England)
Worked Calculations
  • QALYs: treatment gives 4 years at utility 0.75 = 3 QALYs; comparator gives 4 years at 0.5 = 2 QALYs → 1 QALY gained.
  • ICER: new drug costs £40,000 and gives 3 QALYs; current treatment costs £10,000 and gives 2 QALYs → ICER = £30,000 ÷ 1 = £30,000 per QALY - within NICE's £25,000–£35,000 range.
  • Dominance: a new treatment costs less and gives more QALYs → it dominates; no ICER is needed.
  • Discounting: £1,000 of cost incurred in 1 year is valued at £1,000 ÷ 1.035 ≈ £966 today.
Exam-style Scenarios
  • Scenario. A team wants to know whether their ward meets the NICE standard that all patients over 65 admitted with a fall have a lying and standing BP within 24 hours.
    Answer: This is a clinical audit - define the standard and target, collect data, compare, implement changes (e.g. admission proforma, education), and re-audit. Ethics approval is not usually required.
  • Scenario. A wrong-site tooth extraction occurs. What are the responsibilities?
    Answer: Wrong-site surgery is a never event. Respond under PSIRF (patient safety incident investigation), report on LFPSE, fulfil the statutory and professional duty of candour (tell the patient, apologise, explain and follow up in writing), and support staff in a just culture.
  • Scenario. A new cancer drug costs £60,000 per QALY. The condition is severe with a large QALY shortfall. Could NICE recommend it?
    Answer: Possibly - the severity modifier can increase the weight of QALYs (×1.2 or ×1.7), and commercial arrangements (patient access schemes, managed access agreements) can reduce the price. Otherwise it is unlikely to be recommended at that ICER.
  • Scenario. A run chart of daily discharges before noon shows 8 consecutive points above the median after a new ward-round format is introduced.
    Answer: A shift (6 or more consecutive points on one side of the median) - a non-random signal suggesting the change is associated with improvement; continue measuring and check balancing measures (e.g. readmissions).
Key Points
  • Every funding decision has an opportunity cost.
  • NICE uses cost-utility analysis; ICER = cost per QALY gained; threshold £25,000–£35,000 per QALY from April 2026.
  • Audit compares practice with a standard; research generates new knowledge and needs ethics approval.
  • Use PDSA cycles and run charts to test and measure improvement.
  • PSIRF, LFPSE, never events and the duty of candour underpin NHS patient safety.
  • NCDs dominate global mortality; the NHS aims for net zero by 2040–2045.
Guidelines and Further Reading
  • NICE health technology evaluations: the manual (including severity modifier and cost-effectiveness threshold, updated 2026)
  • Drummond MF et al. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP): Guide to quality improvement methods; Best practice in clinical audit
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement: Model for Improvement
  • NHS England: Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (2022); Never events policy and framework
  • GMC and NMC: Openness and honesty when things go wrong - the professional duty of candour
  • Francis R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (2013)
  • Global Burden of Disease Study (IHME); WHO World Health Statistics
  • NHS England: Delivering a "Net Zero" National Health Service (2020)
End of chapter 208